1996 Ford Tracer vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Ford Tracer is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Triumph 2000 (83 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1996 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 279 kg more than 1996 Ford Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1970 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Tracer | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Tracer | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 83 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
