1996 Ford Tracer vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1996 Ford Tracer is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,486 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1996 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Tracer weights approximately 86 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Tracer | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tracer | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |