1996 Ford Tracer vs. 2005 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Tracer would be higher. At 4,390 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP) has 233 more horse power than 1996 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 1495 kg more than 1996 Ford Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Tracer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (427 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Tracer | 2005 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Tracer | LR3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 4390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 2461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1890 mm |