1996 Ford Tracer vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Tracer would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Clio (81 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 209 kg more than 1996 Ford Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Tracer | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Tracer | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1710 mm |