1996 Ford Tracer vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Tracer would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Tracer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1996 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1996 Ford Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda RX-8 (215 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Tracer. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Tracer. 2011 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1996 Ford Tracer has manual transmission. 1996 Ford Tracer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Tracer | 2011 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tracer | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 212 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1411 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1341 mm |