1996 Ford Windstar vs. 1978 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1996 Ford Windstar is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Windstar weights approximately 842 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Windstar | 1978 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Windstar | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1600 mm |