1996 Ford Windstar vs. 1979 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1996 Ford Windstar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1979 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Windstar weights approximately 732 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Windstar | 1979 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Windstar | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1590 mm |
