1996 Ford Windstar vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Windstar weights approximately 500 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Windstar | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Windstar | 3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1192 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1760 mm |