1996 Ford Windstar vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Windstar would be higher. Both 1996 Ford Windstar and 2011 Cadillac CTS are equipped with a 3,000 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1996 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 64 kg more than 1996 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Windstar | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Windstar | CTS |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1842 mm |