1996 Ford Windstar vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1996 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 86 kg more than 1996 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Windstar | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Windstar | CTS |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1842 mm |
