1996 Ford Windstar vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1996 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 738 kg more than 1996 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Windstar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Windstar | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Windstar | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 2430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 6290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2030 mm |
