1996 GAZ 3110 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 GAZ 3110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 GAZ 3110 would be higher. At 2,133 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 GAZ 3110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1996 GAZ 3110. (112 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 GAZ 3110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 GAZ 3110 weights approximately 106 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1996 GAZ 3110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 GAZ 3110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 GAZ 3110 (260 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 GAZ 3110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 GAZ 3110 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | GAZ | Mazda |
| Model | 3110 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2133 cc | 1999 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 112 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1294 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2730 mm |
