1996 Holden Nova vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Holden Nova weights approximately 369 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden Nova (135 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 1996 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden Nova | 1998 Rover Mini | |
| Make | Holden | Rover |
| Model | Nova | Mini |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 696 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |
