1996 Holden Nova vs. 2002 Mazda 626
To start off, 2002 Mazda 626 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 626 weights approximately 177 kg more than 1996 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 626 (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden Nova | 2002 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Nova | 626 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1242 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2680 mm |