1996 Holden Nova vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1996 Holden Nova. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1996 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 197 kg more than 1996 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden Nova. (135 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden Nova | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Holden | Suzuki |
Model | Nova | Reno |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1262 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2610 mm |