1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1955 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher.
Because 1955 Hudson Metropolitan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Hudson Metropolitan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Hudson Metropolitan. (76 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Hudson Metropolitan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1955 Hudson Metropolitan | |
| Make | Holden | Hudson |
| Model | XU 6 | Metropolitan |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 41 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 76 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
