1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1958 Rover P5
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Rover P5 would be higher.
Because 1958 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Rover P5. (222 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Rover P5. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1958 Rover P5 has manual transmission. 1958 Rover P5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1958 Rover P5 | |
| Make | Holden | Rover |
| Model | XU 6 | P5 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
