1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1961 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Triumph Herald would be higher.
Because 1961 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 446 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Triumph Herald. (69 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1961 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | XU 6 | Herald |
Year Released | 1996 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 69 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |