1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1963 Volvo P 210 Duett
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volvo P 210 Duett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volvo P 210 Duett would be higher.
Because 1963 Volvo P 210 Duett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Volvo P 210 Duett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Volvo P 210 Duett. (144 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Volvo P 210 Duett.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1963 Volvo P 210 Duett | |
| Make | Holden | Volvo |
| Model | XU 6 | P 210 Duett |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
