1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1967 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Volvo P 1800 would be higher.
Because 1967 Volvo P 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Volvo P 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Volvo P 1800. (152 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Volvo P 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1967 Volvo P 1800 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | XU 6 | P 1800 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 152 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |