1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1967 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 ZAZ Jalta would be higher.
Because 1967 ZAZ Jalta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 ZAZ Jalta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 463 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 ZAZ Jalta. (52 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1967 ZAZ Jalta | |
Make | Holden | ZAZ |
Model | XU 6 | Jalta |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |