1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher.
Because 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. (216 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | XU 6 | SL |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 216 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |