1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1968 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 1300 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1968 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | XU 6 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 99 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |