1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1969 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Toyota Crown would be higher.
Because 1969 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Toyota Crown. (157 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1969 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | XU 6 | Crown |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
