1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1970 Jaguar Type E
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher.
Because 1970 Jaguar Type E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Jaguar Type E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1970 Jaguar Type E | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | XU 6 | Type E |
Year Released | 1996 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |