1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1972 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Toyota Celica would be higher.
Because 1972 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Toyota Celica. (137 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Toyota Celica. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1972 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1972 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1972 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | XU 6 | Celica |
Year Released | 1996 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |