1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1974 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lincoln Continental would be higher.
Because 1974 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lincoln Continental. (488 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lincoln Continental.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1974 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Holden | Lincoln |
| Model | XU 6 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 488 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
