1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1974 Volvo 164
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 164 would be higher.
Because 1974 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 164. (222 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1974 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Holden | Volvo |
| Model | XU 6 | 164 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
