1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher.
Because 1975 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (167 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1975 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1975 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1975 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | XU 6 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
