1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 421 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1975 Volvo 66 has manual transmission. 1975 Volvo 66 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Holden | Volvo |
| Model | XU 6 | 66 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 56 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
