1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1978 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Corona would be higher.
Because 1978 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Corona. (163 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1978 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | XU 6 | Corona |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
