1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1978 Volvo 264
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 264 would be higher.
Because 1978 Volvo 264 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 264. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 264. (218 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 264. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1978 Volvo 264 has manual transmission. 1978 Volvo 264 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1978 Volvo 264 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | XU 6 | 264 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |