1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1979 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher.
Because 1979 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mercedes-Benz 280. (240 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1979 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | XU 6 | 280 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
