1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1984 Renault 25
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 25 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault 25. (158 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault 25. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1984 Renault 25 has manual transmission. 1984 Renault 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1984 Renault 25 | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | XU 6 | 25 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 103 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
