1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1984 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Seat Ronda would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1984 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Holden | Seat |
Model | XU 6 | Ronda |
Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 61 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 88 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |