1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1985 Renault 18
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 18 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault 18. (163 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1985 Renault 18 | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | XU 6 | 18 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 163 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |