1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1986 Nissan Leopard
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Leopard would be higher.
Because 1986 Nissan Leopard is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Nissan Leopard. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Leopard. (147 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Leopard. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1986 Nissan Leopard has manual transmission. 1986 Nissan Leopard will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1986 Nissan Leopard | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | XU 6 | Leopard |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 98 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
