1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1988 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Fairlane would be higher.
Because 1988 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Fairlane. (304 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1988 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | XU 6 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 304 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |