1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1992 Mazda Eunos
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda Eunos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda Eunos would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (167 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda Eunos.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1992 Mazda Eunos | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | XU 6 | Eunos |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 167 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |