1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault 19 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault 19. (85 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault 19. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1992 Renault 19 has manual transmission. 1992 Renault 19 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | XU 6 | 19 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |