1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1994 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lotus Elan would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lotus Elan. (204 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lotus Elan. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1994 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1994 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 1994 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Holden | Lotus |
| Model | XU 6 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
