1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Mustang would be higher.
Because 1995 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | XU 6 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1996 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 212 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |