1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1995 Maserati Shamal
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Maserati Shamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Maserati Shamal would be higher.
Because 1995 Maserati Shamal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Maserati Shamal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Maserati Shamal. (444 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Maserati Shamal. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1995 Maserati Shamal has manual transmission. 1995 Maserati Shamal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1995 Maserati Shamal | |
Make | Holden | Maserati |
Model | XU 6 | Shamal |
Year Released | 1996 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 321 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 444 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |