1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (773 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden XU 6. (515 Nm). This means 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden XU 6.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | XU 6 | T V-12 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 582 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 773 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |