1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 1999 Volvo C70
To start off, 1999 Volvo C70 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Volvo C70. (220 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 1999 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | XU 6 | C70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |