1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2000 Renault Megane
To start off, 2000 Renault Megane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Renault Megane. (127 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Renault Megane. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2000 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2000 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 2000 Renault Megane | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | XU 6 | Megane |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 127 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |