1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2002 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Armada is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2002 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 2002 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Holden | Mahindra |
Model | XU 6 | Armada |
Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |