1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2005 Koenigsegg CCR
To start off, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2005 Koenigsegg CCR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Koenigsegg CCR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR (920 Nm) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden XU 6. (515 Nm). This means 2005 Koenigsegg CCR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden XU 6. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2005 Koenigsegg CCR has manual transmission. 2005 Koenigsegg CCR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 2005 Koenigsegg CCR | |
Make | Holden | Koenigsegg |
Model | XU 6 | CCR |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 816 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 920 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |