1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2005 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2005 Pagani Zonda is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2005 Pagani Zonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Pagani Zonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2005 Pagani Zonda has manual transmission. 2005 Pagani Zonda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 2005 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Holden | Pagani |
| Model | XU 6 | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 542 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
