1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (281 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2006 Isuzu KB has manual transmission. 2006 Isuzu KB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Holden | Isuzu |
Model | XU 6 | KB |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 281 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |